New consumer survey demonstrates the demand for virtual queuing software for service and store visits during the Coronavirus pandemic.
A newly published Qudini survey of 2,000 UK consumers, which took place on the 25th of September, 2020, found that the vast majority of consumers would appreciate being able to join virtual queues at retail stores during Covid-19.
If a retailer that usually has long queues for service used a virtual queuing system – to enable you as a customer to avoid physically queuing by joining a virtual queue (from a host or your phone) and to receive updates by phone and the host as your turn draws near, would this make you…
Overall, consumers responded positively to the idea of using a virtual queuing system to escape physically queuing, with 81% of Millennial and GenZ consumers seeing some benefits, stating that:
- 23% would be more likely to wait in the queue – demonstrating that virtual queuing systems could help to retain 20% of customers in the event of a wait to enter the store or receive service.
- 25% would be more likely to return to the store – showing that using a virtual queuing system could improve loyalty amongst a quarter of younger customers.
- 21% would think better of the retailer and 26% would feel safer and happier in the current environment – demonstrating that using a virtual queuing system, particularly during the pandemic, could help to improve customer relationships and brand relevance.
- 19% would be more likely to tell their friends about the retailer – indicating that advocacy and NPS scores will be improved with retailers using virtual queuing systems, even more so than with hosts.
- 18% would be more likely to buy something in-store (8% more than those with hosts), while 11% would also be more likely to shop with the retailer online (the same percent as with hosts) – suggesting that by using virtual queuing systems retailers can increase their immediate and long-term revenues across channels.
- 18% would be more likely to choose the retailer over their competitors – suggesting that retailers can improve their growth using virtual queuing software.
! These results demonstrate that retailers with long waiting experience could obtain a significant return on investment through using customer hosts to manage customers.
Overall, the concept of virtual queuing systems has much greater appeal amongst younger demographics, particularly GenZ and Millennial demographics.
Similar to the host managed waiting experience, a virtual queuing system is 2-3 times more likely to drive GenZ, Millennial and GenX customers to make purchases both in-store and online than it is with Baby Boomers.
However, unlike host managed waiting experience, the younger generations are also much (c.35%) more likely than Baby Boomers to have improved retention, relationships and perception as a result of a retailer using a virtual queuing system.
Comparing these insights demonstrates that host managed waiting experiences are more necessary for retaining and converting older generations, while the younger, more digitally-minded demographics are equally, and often even slightly more, positively effected by virtual queuing over their phones.
The greater appreciation of virtual queuing via phone amongst younger generations indicates that there could be a far bigger future for virtual queuing beyond the Covid-19 pandemic.
The impact virtual queues have on higher income earners
Higher earning households are also much more likely to be converted to an in-store and online purchase and to telling their friends about brands as a result of a retailer using a virtual queuing system.
This further suggests that virtual queuing software could help to increase retailer revenues.
Consumer stated benefits of using virtual queues
94% of younger generations see some benefit in using a virtual queuing system, while 65% of Baby Boomers also see a benefit.
The most appealing benefits of a virtual queuing system to consumers were the ability to the reduce risk of contracting Covid-19, followed by saving time and avoiding poor weather conditions. Younger generations are more concerned with using their time productively and fair process while older generations are more concerned with avoiding poor weather conditions.
All household incomes are equally likely to see the health benefits of a virtual queuing system.
90% of customers with household incomes of more than £50,001 see some benefit in using a virtual queuing system, compared to 79% of those with household incomes of less than £50,000.
How consumers prefer to join virtual queues
When asked how consumers would want to engage with the virtual queue, it was interesting to see that consumers were most likely to join the queue by texting an SMS code (47%), followed by through a host with a tablet (46%). Interestingly, consumers were only slightly less likely to want to join a queue by a self-service tablet kiosk (43%) or a QR code (45%).
Half of customers (48%) said they were willing to give their mobile number purely to receive updates about their queue position, while a quarter (27%) said they would opt into marketing messaging.
Baby Boomer consumers are slightly more likely to join the queue via host or by SMS code than they are by QR code or a self-service tablet kiosk, whereas Millennial and GenZ consumers are equally likely to use all methods and are, interestingly, slightly more likely to use their phone or a self-service kiosk over a host.
Younger generations are 22% more likely to give their mobile number and 35% more likely to opt into marketing messaging.
Interestingly consumers from higher household income groups are more likely to join the queue by SMS, QR code and most methods in general. They are also more likely to give their mobile numbers and twice more likely to opt-in to marketing communications.
On average, female respondents are slightly (18%) more likely than males to join the virtual queue by each method and to provide their mobile number purely to receive SMS updates about their queue position.
However, both genders are equally as likely to opt-in to marketing messages, at 26% (a quarter of respondents).
How long should queues be before retailers use virtual queues
Most consumers considered anywhere between a 0 and 15 minute wait time as the appropriate length before using a virtual queuing system. There was a near even split in the correlation between joining a queue via phone or store host and the wait time. This was especially interesting, as we had assumed that people would require a long wait before joining the queue by phone rather than through the host.
Looking at the mean wait time that customers said that joining the virtual queue via a host vs by phone would be useful to them, and we can see people would find virtual queuing to be useful at a mean wait time of 9.02 minutes with the wait being just 1 minute less for the host to become useful.
In general, Baby Boomers are the least patient and would find a virtual queuing system system at a lower mean wait time of 7.6 minutes by phone and 8 minutes by host. Whereas Millennial and GenZ consumers appear to be more patient with a mean wait time of 9 minutes for the host vs 10.7 minutes for joining the queue by phone.
Those from higher income households think a higher wait time is acceptable before a virtual queue comes into effect.